Impact Factor:1.578 | Ranking:53/76 in Nutrition & Dietetics
Source:2012 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2013)
Review of the Current Literature
- Sharon Y. Irving, RN, PhD, CRNP1
- Beth Lyman, RN, MSN, CNSC2
- LaDonna Northington, RN, DNS3
- Jacqueline A. Bartlett, RN, PhD2
- Carol Kemper, RN, PhD, CPHQ2
- NOVEL Project Work Group
- <a id="aff-1" name="aff-1"/>1Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- <a id="aff-2" name="aff-2"/>2Childrens Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
- <a id="aff-3" name="aff-3"/>3University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
<ol class="contributor-list" id="contrib-group-2"/>
- Sharon Y. Irving, RN, PhD, CRNP, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Claire M. Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Rm 427, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Email: ysha{at}nursing.upenn.edu
Abstract
Placement of a nasogastric enteral access device (NG-EAD), often referred to as a nasogastric tube, is a common practice and largely in the domain of nursing care. Most often an NG-EAD is placed at the bedside without radiographic assistance. Correct initial placement and ongoing location verification are the primary challenges surrounding NG-EAD use and have implications for patient safety. Although considered an innocuous procedure, placement of an NG-EAD carries risk of serious and potentially lethal complications. Despite acknowledgment that an abdominal radiograph is the gold standard, other methods of verifying placement location are widely used and have success rates from 80% to 85%. The long-standing challenges surrounding bedside placement of NG-EADs and a practice alert issued by the Child Health Patient Safety Organization on this issue were the stimuli for the conception of The New Opportunities for Verification of Enteral Tube Location Project sponsored by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Its mission is to identify and promote best practices with the potential of technology development that will enable accurate determination of NG-EAD placement for both the inpatient and outpatient pediatric populations. This article presents the challenges of bedside NG-EAD placement and ongoing location verification in children through an overview of the current state of the science. It is important for all healthcare professionals to be knowledgeable about the current literature, to be vigilant for possible complications, and to avoid complacency with NG-EAD placement and ongoing verification of tube location.
- © 2014 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and American Association of Critical Care Nurses
What's this?
<span id="related-urls"/><span id="patientinform-links"/>
« Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents
Other journals by A.S.P.E.N.
- Most Read
- A.S.P.E.N. Position Paper: Recommendations for Changes in Commercially Available Parenteral Multivitamin and Multi-Trace Element Products
- Extending Our Knowledge of Fermentable, Short-Chain Carbohydrates for Managing Gastrointestinal Symptoms
- Standards for Nutrition Support: Pediatric Hospitalized Patients
- Feeding Tube Placement: Errors and Complications
- Nutrition Concerns and Health Effects of Vegetarian Diets
» View all Most Read articles - Most Cited
- Standards for Specialized Nutrition Support: Home Care Patients
- Indirect Calorimetry: A Practical Guide for Clinicians
- Acute Complications Associated with Bedside Placement of Feeding Tubes
- Improving the Safety and Effectiveness of Parenteral Nutrition: Results of a Quality Improvement Collaboration
- Feeding the Hypotensive Patient: Does Enteral Feeding Precipitate or Protect Against Ischemic Bowel?
» View all Most Cited articles
via Smart Health Shop Forum http://ift.tt/1qfJHij
No comments:
Post a Comment