Please support our site by enabling javascript to view ads.
The core of President Barack Obama's foreign policy was revealed in the moment he gazed into the eyes of hundreds of cadets at a West Point graduation ceremony on Wednesday.
"You are the first class to graduate since 9/11 who may not be sent into combat in Iraq or Afghanistan," Obama said at the famed military academy in the state of New York.
Obama made his name as a young Illinois lawmaker railing against the invasion of Iraq, and rode that anti-war tide all the way to the White House.
His major foreign policy speech Wednesday, in which he laid out a blueprint for US leadership in the world while avoiding military quagmires, was partly about political vindication.
"The main message that he delivered since being in office is 'I am getting this country out of the two wars I have inherited,'" said James Goldgeier, dean of the School of International Service at American University.
"He said he is going to do it, and that is what he has done."
Obama's address, his latest attempt at defining his elusive foreign policy doctrine as he barrels from global crisis to global crisis, was many things.
It was an explanatory note for historians who begin sizing up his legacy in just two and a half years -- and who will ask for instance, why did Obama intervene in Libya but not in Syria?
It was a settling of political scores: Obama has bristled in recent months at criticism from the likes of John McCain and other Republicans who brand him feckless and say he is bullied by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Obama tried to debunk the critique that being a reluctant warrior is a strength, not a weakness.
He enlisted General Dwight Eisenhower, whose 1953-1961 presidency is remembered as a peaceful interregnum between World War II and Korea and Vietnam.
"Tough talk often draws headlines, but war rarely conforms to slogans," Obama said, before quoting Ike's dictum: "War is mankind's most tragic and stupid folly."
The president also laid down a blueprint for future presidents on how America could lead the world but avoid spilling the blood which soaked the last decade of war.
Mark Jacobson, a former senior NATO official in Afghanistan, said Obama was sending a message that "an aggressive foreign policy or an internationalist United States does not mean military intervention."
Obama's speech came a day after he announced plans to leave a 9,800 strong training force behind in Afghanistan -- but added that all American soldiers would be home before he leaves office in early 2017.
Leadership in Obama's lexicon means not rushing off into major land wars abroad or deploying military force to solve every problem: "Just because we have the best hammer does not mean that every problem is a nail," he said.
It is reflected in his $5 billion plan to help equip allies to fight spreading Islamic extremism in an arc from South Asia to the Sahel.
- Realist -
The president staked out realist ground in a political space between interventionists who want to wield a big US stick and isolationists who would let the world solve its own problems.
Above all, Obama counsels unsheathing the US military only in a case of true last resort.
"The United States will use military force, unilaterally if necessary, when our core interests demand it -- when our people are threatened; when our livelihoods are at stake; when the security of our allies is in danger. "
In other words, adventures like Iraq are out.
But those hoping that Obama would live up to a senior aide's pledge that he would flesh out where he would take the United States in the last two-and-a-half years of his presidency were disappointed.
Obama did say that the successful Ukrainian elections over the weekend justified his policy of building an international coalition to isolate Russia and support the fragile democracy in Kiev.
And he said a similar approach to nuclear talks with Iran had brought the prospect of a deal to curtail the Islamic Republic's nuclear program closer than ever before.
But Obama's critics would refute both those claims -- and his speech seemed just as likely to fan criticism of his approach as cool it.
Conservatives complain Obama caricatures their arguments -- and sets up false choices between massive military interventions on the one hand and taking no action on the other.
"It was just a giant rodeo of straw men," said Thomas Donnelly, of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative Washington think tank.
"The world, both adversary and ally, will entirely discount this. He is a speech giving president and he is not much on action."
Other critics complain the speech was short on constructive solutions to Middle East tumult, a revanchist Russia and a rising China that flouts US "rules of the road."
Jacobson, however, said Obama had done exactly what he should as a reflective leader, not jumping into every global crisis.
"We want presidents who have a long agenda," said Jacobson, now a senior advisor to the Truman Project.
col/vlk
http://ift.tt/1iuf5AK
The core of President Barack Obama's foreign policy was revealed in the moment he gazed into the eyes of hundreds of cadets at a West Point graduation ceremony on Wednesday.
"You are the first class to graduate since 9/11 who may not be sent into combat in Iraq or Afghanistan," Obama said at the famed military academy in the state of New York.
Obama made his name as a young Illinois lawmaker railing against the invasion of Iraq, and rode that anti-war tide all the way to the White House.
His major foreign policy speech Wednesday, in which he laid out a blueprint for US leadership in the world while avoiding military quagmires, was partly about political vindication.
"The main message that he delivered since being in office is 'I am getting this country out of the two wars I have inherited,'" said James Goldgeier, dean of the School of International Service at American University.
"He said he is going to do it, and that is what he has done."
Obama's address, his latest attempt at defining his elusive foreign policy doctrine as he barrels from global crisis to global crisis, was many things.
It was an explanatory note for historians who begin sizing up his legacy in just two and a half years -- and who will ask for instance, why did Obama intervene in Libya but not in Syria?
It was a settling of political scores: Obama has bristled in recent months at criticism from the likes of John McCain and other Republicans who brand him feckless and say he is bullied by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Obama tried to debunk the critique that being a reluctant warrior is a strength, not a weakness.
He enlisted General Dwight Eisenhower, whose 1953-1961 presidency is remembered as a peaceful interregnum between World War II and Korea and Vietnam.
"Tough talk often draws headlines, but war rarely conforms to slogans," Obama said, before quoting Ike's dictum: "War is mankind's most tragic and stupid folly."
The president also laid down a blueprint for future presidents on how America could lead the world but avoid spilling the blood which soaked the last decade of war.
Mark Jacobson, a former senior NATO official in Afghanistan, said Obama was sending a message that "an aggressive foreign policy or an internationalist United States does not mean military intervention."
Obama's speech came a day after he announced plans to leave a 9,800 strong training force behind in Afghanistan -- but added that all American soldiers would be home before he leaves office in early 2017.
Leadership in Obama's lexicon means not rushing off into major land wars abroad or deploying military force to solve every problem: "Just because we have the best hammer does not mean that every problem is a nail," he said.
It is reflected in his $5 billion plan to help equip allies to fight spreading Islamic extremism in an arc from South Asia to the Sahel.
- Realist -
The president staked out realist ground in a political space between interventionists who want to wield a big US stick and isolationists who would let the world solve its own problems.
Above all, Obama counsels unsheathing the US military only in a case of true last resort.
"The United States will use military force, unilaterally if necessary, when our core interests demand it -- when our people are threatened; when our livelihoods are at stake; when the security of our allies is in danger. "
In other words, adventures like Iraq are out.
But those hoping that Obama would live up to a senior aide's pledge that he would flesh out where he would take the United States in the last two-and-a-half years of his presidency were disappointed.
Obama did say that the successful Ukrainian elections over the weekend justified his policy of building an international coalition to isolate Russia and support the fragile democracy in Kiev.
And he said a similar approach to nuclear talks with Iran had brought the prospect of a deal to curtail the Islamic Republic's nuclear program closer than ever before.
But Obama's critics would refute both those claims -- and his speech seemed just as likely to fan criticism of his approach as cool it.
Conservatives complain Obama caricatures their arguments -- and sets up false choices between massive military interventions on the one hand and taking no action on the other.
"It was just a giant rodeo of straw men," said Thomas Donnelly, of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative Washington think tank.
"The world, both adversary and ally, will entirely discount this. He is a speech giving president and he is not much on action."
Other critics complain the speech was short on constructive solutions to Middle East tumult, a revanchist Russia and a rising China that flouts US "rules of the road."
Jacobson, however, said Obama had done exactly what he should as a reflective leader, not jumping into every global crisis.
"We want presidents who have a long agenda," said Jacobson, now a senior advisor to the Truman Project.
col/vlk
http://ift.tt/1iuf5AK
via Smart Health Shop Forum http://ift.tt/1k2TiFD
No comments:
Post a Comment